Sustainable Competitiveness of Red Onion through Collective Action of Farmers in West Sumatra

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Silfia Silfia
Amelia R. Nicolas
Elfa Rahmi Fitri
Resa Yulita
Lady Chania

Abstract

The competitiveness and sustainability of agriculture are closely related to small-scale farming efforts. This research contributes to the transformation of individual farmers into a collective for small-scale farm enterprises, which face constraints necessitating the development of synergies. This is particularly relevant for red onion farmers in the high plains of the Gumanti Valley, Western Sumatra. The research questions are: How do the community's strengths sustain competitiveness and sustainability? What strategies can be formulated to enhance these aspects for the red onion farming community? The study aims to explore the strengths of onion farmers' communities and strategies to reinforce them, thereby promoting sustainability and competitiveness. Conducted in the agricultural area of the Gumanti Valley district of Solok Province from 2019 to 2020, this descriptive research employs CEEI, SWOT, and QSPM methodologies. The findings indicate that the competitiveness and sustainability of the red onion business have improved, with increases observed in collective innovation, supply chain management, and access to economic resources and opportunities, leading to enhanced income accumulation and profit sharing.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Silfia Silfia, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Payakumbuh

Department of Management Agribussines

Elfa Rahmi Fitri, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Payakumbuh

Department of Management Estate

Resa Yulita, Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Payakumbuh

Department of Food Crop Production Technology

Lady Chania, Ehime University

The United Gtaduate School of Agricultural Sciences

How to Cite
1.
Silfia S, Nicolas AR, Fitri ER, Yulita R, Chania L. Sustainable Competitiveness of Red Onion through Collective Action of Farmers in West Sumatra. J. appl. agricultural sci. technol. [Internet]. 2025Aug.24 [cited 2025Aug.28];9(3):332-45. Available from: https://www.jaast.org/index.php/jaast/article/view/372

References

  1. Nugroho AD, Prasada IY, Lakner Z. Comparing the effect of climate change on agricultural competitiveness in developing and developed countries. J Clean Prod 2023;406:137139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137139.
  2. Vernet A, Khayesi JNO, George V, George G, Bahaj AS. How does energy matter ? Rural electrification , entrepreneurship , and community development in Kenya. Energy Policy 2019;126:88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.012.
  3. Latruffe L, Diazabakana A, Bockstaller C, Desjeux Y, Finn J, Kelly E, et al. Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: A review of indicators. Stud Agric Econ 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1624.
  4. Latruffe L. Competitiveness , productivity and efficiency in the agricultural and agri- food sectors. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1787/18156797.
  5. Monke EA, Pearson SR. Review: The policy analysis matrix for agricultural development. Dev South Afr 1990;7:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768359008439507.
  6. Juniah R, Toha MT, Zakir S, Rahmi H. Potential Economic Value of Water Resource Sustainability for Sustainable Environment: A Case Study in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2023;13:165. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.1.16223.
  7. Helmi, Azhari R, Henmaidi, Silfia, Riyadhie I. Identifying key factors affecting integrated and sustainable development of red onion horticulture cluster area. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.2.6875.
  8. Harris JM. Basic Principles of Sustainable Development. Tufts Univ; 2000. http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c13/e1-46b-01-00.pdf.
  9. Glavic P, Lukman R. Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J Clean Prod 2007;15:1875–1885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006.
  10. Mgomezulu WR, Edriss A-K, Machira K, Pangapanga-Phiri I. Modelling farmers’ adoption decisions of sustainable agricultural practices under varying agro-ecological conditions: A new perspective. Innov Green Dev 2023;2:100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100036.
  11. Mgomezulu WR, Edriss A, Machira K. Towards sustainability in the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices : Implications on household poverty , food and nutrition security. Innov Green Dev 2023;2:100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100054.
  12. Thapa G. Smallholder or family farming in transforming economies of Asia. Int Fund Agric Dev (IFAD) 2010; https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b4c293b1-2694-4789-9289-cbeb5aed0e65/content.
  13. Gelard P, Ghazi E. Strategic entrepreneurship element from theory to practice strategic entrepreneurship element from theory to practice. Int J Bus Technopreneursh 2014;4:205–219. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329610353_Strategic_Entrepreneurship_Element_from_Theory_to_Practice.
  14. Syahyuti N. Pembangunan pertanian dengan pendekatan komunitas: kasus rancangan Program Prima Tani. Forum Penelit Agro Ekon 2016;23:102. https://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/5258.
  15. Lowder SK, Skoet J, Raney T. The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms and family farms worldwide. World Dev 2016;87:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041.
  16. Imanullah MN, Latifah E, Adistuti A. Peran dan kedudukan petani dalam sistem perdagangan international. Yustisia 2016;5:71–78. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/view/8720.
  17. Najeera J. Integration of small farmers into global value chain: challenges and opportunities inside the current global demand. TEC Empres 2017;11:7–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.18845/te.v11i2.3229.
  18. Raungpaka V, Savetpanuvong P. Information orientation of small-scale farmers' community enterprises in Northern Thailand. Kasetsart J Soc Sci 2017;38:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.018.
  19. Upadhaya S, Arbuckle JG, Schulte LA. Developing farmer typologies to inform conservation outreach in agricultural landscapes. Land use policy 2020;101:105157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105157.
  20. Nolasary MP. Analisis Daya Saing dan Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah Terhadap Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Solok. J Manaj dan Kewirausahaan 2019;10:1–8. http://scholar.unand.ac.id/23276/.
  21. Elfianto, Syahni R, Asmawi, Ifdal. The Behavior of Shallot Farmer Using Pesticides in Lembah Gumanti District, Solok Regency, Indonesia. IJASEIT 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.12.5.17161.
  22. Silfia, Helmi, Melinda, Henmaidi. Penguatan Daya Saing Sektor Pertanian Barbasis Usaha Tani Skala Kecil; Review Literature. J Pembang Nagari 2018;3:109. https://doi.org/10.30559/jpn.v3i1.77.
  23. Silfia, Helmi, Noer M, Henmaidi. Entrepreneurship for developing small and medium-scale farmers in agricultural cluster. Trikonomika 2020;19:87–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/trikonomika.v19i2.2580.
  24. Silfia, Helmi, Noer M, Henmaidi. Developing the competitiveness and sustainability of agricultural cluster areas based on micro, small and medium enterprise by means of community entrepreneurship. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;757. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/757/1/012011.
  25. Silfia S, Helmi H, Noer M, Henmaidi H. Measurement Model on Community Farmer for Agriculture Cluster Development. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2021;11:1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.3.12496.
  26. Putri NE, Helmi, Silfia, Humaida H, Frinaldi A. Political community entrepreneurship policy as an effort to reduce infrastructural violence: a systematic literature review. Cogent Soc Sci 2024;10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2371676.
  27. Panudju AT, Rahardja S, Nurilmala M, Marimin. Decision Support System in Fisheries Industry : Current State and Future Agenda. IJASEIT 2023;13:599–610. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.2.17914.
  28. Asnawi A, Amrawaty AA, Nirwana. Strategy in Developing Microfinance Institution to Support Beef Cattle Farming Business in Rural Areas. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2023;13:438–445. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.2.16517.
  29. Bacq S, Hertel C, Lumpkin GT. Communities at the nexus of entrepreneurship and societal impact: A cross-disciplinary literature review. Journal of Business Venturing 2022;37:106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106231.
  30. Shrestha KK, Paudel G, Ojha H, Paudel NS, Nuberg I, Cedamon E. Community entrepreneurship: Lessons from Nepal’s Chaubas community forestry sawmill. For Policy Econ 2022;141:102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102779 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389934122000910.
  31. Meyer C. The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities. J Bus Ventur 2020;35:106034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106034.
  32. Yeshiwas Y, Alemayehu M, Adgo E. The rise and fall of onion production; its multiple constraints on pre-harvest and post-harvest management issues along the supply chain in northwest Ethiopia. Heliyon 2023;9:e15905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15905.
  33. Matthan T. Speculative crops: Gambling on the onion in rural India. Geoforum 2022;130:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.10.014.
  34. Mandake S, Shikalgar N, Deshmukh AM. Design and development of an adequate ventilation system to preserve freshly harvested onions. materialtiday; proceeding 2023;72:943–950. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214785322059089.
  35. Silva J, Bertoldo R, Fungaro MHP, Massi FP, Taniwaki MH, Sant'Ana AS, et al. Black aspergilli in Brazilian onions: From field to market. Int J Food Microbiol 2021;337:108958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108958. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168160520304529.
  36. Nazir M. Metode Penelitian. 2014. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20336654.
  37. Puyt RW, Lie FB, Wilderom CPM. The origins of SWOT analysis. Long Range Plann 2023;56:102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304.
  38. Longsheng C, Shah SAA, Solangi YA, Ahmad M, Ali S. An integrated SWOT-multi-criteria analysis of implementing sustainable waste-to-energy in Pakistan. Renew Energy 2023;19:1438–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.112 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148122009521.
  39. Rangkuty F. Teknik membedah kasus bisnis analisa SWOT cara perhitungan bobot, rating dan OCAI. Jakarta: PT Gramedia; 2017. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/65039/teknik-membedah-kasus-bisnis-analisis-swot-cara-perhitungan-bobot-rating-dan-ocai.html.
  40. Rangkuty F. SWOT balanced scorecard. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Gramedia Utama; 2014. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/10789/swot-balanced-scorecard-teknik-menyusun-strategi-korporat-yang-efektif-plus-cara-mengelola-kinerja-dan-risiko.html.
  41. Assauri S. Strategic management; sustainability competitive advantage. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. J; 2018, p. 1–332. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20292308.
  42. Soares CA, Shendrikova D, Crevani G, Silinto B. Enabling factors for the development of mini-grid solutions in Mozambique : A PESTLE-based analysis. Energy Strateg Rev 2023;45:101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101040.
  43. Mallick SK, Rudra S, Samanta R. Sustainable ecotourism development using SWOT and QSPM approach : A study on Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu. Int J Geoheritage Park 2020;8:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.06.001.
  44. Purwandari S. Analisa Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) sebagai landasan menentukan strategi pemasaran pada SMK Citra Medika Sukohardjo. J Sainstech Politek Indonusa Surakarta I 2018;3:107–118. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=hCJrQdUAAAAJ&citation_for_view=hCJrQdUAAAAJ:u-x6o8ySG0sC.
  45. David FR. Strategic Management Concepts: A Competitive Advantage Approach. 2022, p. 673. https://books.google.com/books?id=ZYopygAACAAJ. https://cmls.org.uk/online/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Strategic-Management-A-Competitive-Advantage-Approach.pdf.