Quantifying the Direct Relationship between Solar Radiation and Lysimeter-Measured Evapotranspiration of Cherry Tomato under Tropical Greenhouse Conditions

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 24, 2026
https://doi.org/10.55043/jaast.v10i3.499
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ahmad Tusi
Universitas Lampung
Fitrasia Aura Ramadanti
Universitas Lampung
Melvi Melvi
Universitas Lampung
Oktafri Oktafri
Universitas Lampung

Abstract

Despite advances in greenhouse technology, few studies have quantified the direct relationship between solar radiation and lysimeter-measured crop evapotranspiration (ETc) in cherry tomato under tropical greenhouse conditions. This study aimed to fill this gap by determining ETc of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) using a weighing lysimeter (5 min intervals, November 28, 2023 to January 6, 2024) and analysing its relationship with solar radiation under different sky conditions. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse containing 32 plants arranged in two planting beds and irrigated with a drip system. All environmental and crop parameters were monitored through sensors integrated into a digital dashboard. Daily solar radiation ranged from 4.7 to 13.6 MJ m⁻² d⁻¹ (mean 9.0 MJ m⁻² d⁻¹), whereas ETc ranged from 2.03 to 3.19 mm day⁻¹ (mean 2.60 mm day⁻¹). A significant positive correlation was found (r = 0.717, R² = 0.514, p < 0.001), yielding the overall regression ETc = 0.069 × Rad + 2.004. A critical threshold of 8 MJ m⁻² d⁻¹ was identified: under sunny conditions (Rad ≥8), ETc = 0.074 × Rad + 2.000 (R² = 0.446, p < 0.001); under cloudy conditions (Rad <8), the near-zero slope (0.009, R² = 0.314) supported using mean ETc = 2.41 mm day⁻¹. Diurnal analysis revealed a 30–45 min ETc lag on sunny days, informing optimal irrigation timing (before 11:00–12:00). Water use efficiency was 33% higher on cloudy days (0.364 vs. 0.273 mm MJ⁻¹ m²). These empirical models can be directly embedded into automated irrigation systems, supporting precision irrigation practices in greenhouse cherry tomato cultivation under tropical conditions. Future research should focus on integrating VPD and physiological crop parameters to further improve ETc prediction accuracy under low-light conditions.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Ahmad Tusi, Universitas Lampung

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Fitrasia Aura Ramadanti, Universitas Lampung

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Melvi Melvi, Universitas Lampung

Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Oktafri Oktafri, Universitas Lampung

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

How to Cite
1.
Tusi A, Ramadanti FA, Melvi M, Oktafri O. Quantifying the Direct Relationship between Solar Radiation and Lysimeter-Measured Evapotranspiration of Cherry Tomato under Tropical Greenhouse Conditions. J. appl. agricultural sci. technol. [Internet]. 2026Aug.24 [cited 2026Aug.25];10(3):592-608. Available from: https://www.jaast.org/index.php/jaast/article/view/499

References

  1. Saida MDN, Rinawati, Karlina S, Yani S, Megawati M, Sehusman, et al. Buletin Konsumsi Pangan Tahun 2020. Buletin Konsumsi Pangan 2020;11. https://satudata.pertanian.go.id/details/publikasi/208
  2. Hemming S, Zwart FD, Elings A, Petropoulou A, Righini I. Cherry Tomato Production in Intelligent Greenhouses—Sensors and AI for Control of Climate, Irrigation, Crop Yield, and Quality. Sensors 2020;20:6430. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226430
  3. Fakhrunnisa E, Gema K, Sudarsono. Produksi Tomat Cherry dan Tomat Beef dengan Sistem Hidroponik di Perusahaan Amazing Farm, Bandung. Buletin Agrohorti 2018;6:316–25. https://doi.org/10.29244/agrob.v6i3.21094.
  4. Fibriana R, Ginting YS, Ferdiansyah E, Mubarak S. Analisis besar atau laju evapotranspirasi pada daerah terbuka. Agrotekma 2018;2:130–7. https://doi.org/10.31289/agr.v2i2.1626
  5. Katsoulas N, Stanghellini C. Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: Different models for different applications. Agronomy 2019;9:392. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070392.
  6. Moraes DHMD, Mesquita M, Bueno AM, Flores RA, Oliveira HFED, Lima FSDL, et al. Combined Effects of Induced Water Deficit and Foliar Application of Silicon on the Gas Exchange of Tomatoes for Processing. Agronomy 2020;10:1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111715.
  7. Zheng Y, Zou J, Lin S, Jin C, Shi M, Yang B, et al. Effects of different light intensity on the growth of tomato seedlings in a plant factory. PLoS One 2023;18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294876.
  8. Abarikwu OI, Adama JC, Ezeani EU. Relationship between reference evapotranspiration and some climatic parameters, Umudike, Nigeria. CIGR Journal 2019;21:28–33. https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/download/5074/2907/22939
  9. Yambao CGM, Ines RL. Irrigation Scheduling Based on Evapotranspiration of Tomato (Solanumm Lycopersicum) Using Atmometer in The Upland Rolling Production Area. Indian J Sci Technol 2024;17:566–76. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v17i6.2754.
  10. Negash TW, Tefera AT, Ashemi Bikila G, Tezera Bizuneh K, Awulachew TW, Gurms Dinku A. Determination of Evapotranspiration and Crop Coefficient for Tomato by Using Non-Weighing Lysimeter in Semiarid Region. Air, Soil and Water Research 2024;17. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786221241291313.
  11. Shahrajabian MH, Sun W. A Review of Lysimeter Studies and Experiments by Considering Agricultural Production. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry 2024;20:114–32. http://www.jspb.ru/issues/2024/N2/JSPB_2024_2_114-132.html
  12. Adha F, Manik TK, Rosadi RAB. Evaluasi penggunaan lysimeter untuk menduga evapotranspirasi standar dan evapotranspirasi tanaman kedelai (Glycine Max (L) Merril). Jurnal Teknotan 2016;10:71–9. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/teknotan/article/view/10334
  13. Shin JH, Park JS, Son JE. Estimating the actual transpiration rate with compensated levels of accumulated radiation for the efficient irrigation of soilless cultures of paprika plants. Agric Water Manag 2014;135:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.009.
  14. Gong X, Bo G, Liu H, Ge J, Li X, Gao S. Performance of the Improved Priestley-Taylor Model for Simulating Evapotranspiration of Greenhouse Tomato at Different Growth Stages. Plants 2022;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212956.
  15. Yao M, Gao M, Wang J, Li B, Mao L, Zhao M, et al. Estimating Evapotranspiration of Greenhouse Tomato under Different Irrigation Levels Using a Modified Dual Crop Coefficient Model in Northeast China. Agriculture (Switzerland) 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091741.
  16. Shi W, Zhang X, Xue X, Feng F, Zheng W, Chen L. Analyzing Evapotranspiration in Greenhouses: A Lysimeter-Based Calculation and Evaluation Approach. Agronomy 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123059.
  17. Nikolaou G, Neocleous D, Kitta E, Katsoulas N. Estimating cucumber crop coefficients under different greenhouse microclimatic conditions. Int J Biometeorol 2023;67:1745–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-023-02535-y.
  18. Rho H, Jo JS, Sim HS, Moon YH, Woo UJ, Kim SK. Development of a Cucumber Transpiration Model Based on a Simplified Penman-Monteith Model in a Semi-closed Greenhouse. HortScience 2023;58:1208–16. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI17218-23.
  19. Ge J, Zhao L, Yu Z, Liu H, Zhang L, Gong X, et al. Prediction of Greenhouse Tomato Crop Evapotranspiration Using XGBoost Machine Learning Model. Plants 2022;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151923.
  20. Tunalı U, Tüzel IH, Tüzel Y, Şenol Y. Estimation of actual crop evapotranspiration using artificial neural networks in tomato grown in closed soilless culture system. Agric Water Manag 2023;284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108331.
  21. Makkink GF. Testing the Penman formula by means of lysimeters. Journal of the Institution of Water Engineerrs 1957; 11:277–88. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/groenekennis/832275
  22. Beckmann MZ, Burck Duarte GR, De Paula VA, Gonzalez Mendez ME, Nogueira Peil RM. Solar radiation measured in protected ambient with tomato culture in summer-autumn seasons in Rio Grande do Sul State. Ciencia Rural 2006;36:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-84782006000100013.
  23. Medrano E, Lorenzo P, Sánchez-Guerrero MC, Montero JI. Evaluation and modelling of greenhouse cucumber-crop transpiration under high and low radiation conditions. Sci Hortic 2005;105:163–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2005.01.024.
  24. Xia L, Xinlan L, Rui W, Tianlai L, Hui X, Xinyong Z. Analysis of the variation and utilization of total solar radiation in solar greenhouses. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 2012;28:104–8. https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-0486
  25. Qin Y, Gong A, Liu X, Li N, Ji T, Li J, et al. Testing a Simulation Model for the Response of Tomato Fruit Quality Formation to Temperature and Light in Solar Greenhouses. Plants 2024;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121662.
  26. Yang F, Huang S, Gao R, Liu W, Yong T, Wang X, et al. Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red : far-red ratio. Field Crops Res 2014;155:245–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.011
  27. Zhang M, Cui J, Ju J, Hu Y, Liu X, He R, et al. The Impact of Daily Light Integral from Artificial Lighting on Tomato Seedling Cultivation in Plant Factory. Agronomy 2025;15:70. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010070.
  28. Hung LQ, Hong TD, Ellis RH. Constant, Fluctuating and Effective Temperature and Seed Longevity: a Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Exemplar. Ann Bot 2001;88:465–70. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1487
  29. Tu C, Ristaino JB, Hu S. Soil microbial biomass and activity in organic tomato farming systems: Effects of organic inputs and straw mulching. Soil Biol Biochem 2006;38:247–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.002
  30. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements). 1998. https://www.fao.org/4/x0490e/x0490e00.htm
  31. Sousa KCD, Costa RNT, Nunes KG, Silva AOD. Irrigation strategies in production of cherry tomatoes under water scarcity conditions. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2022;26:425–32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v26n6p425-432.
  32. Qiu R, Song J, Du T, Kang S, Tong L, Chen R et al. Response of evapotranspiration and yield to planting density of solar greenhouse grown tomato in northwest China. Agric Water Manag 2013;130:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGWAT.2013.08.013.
  33. Orgaz F, Fernández MD, Bonachela S, Gallardo M, Fereres E. Evapotranspiration of horticultural crops in an unheated plastic greenhouse. Agric Water Manag 2005;72:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGWAT.2004.09.010.
  34. Flores-Velazquez J, Akrami M, Villagrán E. The Role of Radiation in the Modelling of Crop Evapotranspiration from Open Field to Indoor Crops. Agronomy 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112593.
  35. Gong X, Qiu R, Sun J, Ge J, Li Y, Wang S. Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of tomato grown in a solar greenhouse under full and deficit irrigation. Agric Water Manag 2020;235:106154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGWAT.2020.106154.