Characteristics of Gandaria (Bouea macrophylla Griff) Fruit Wine from Primary Fermentation and 14 Days Aging with Different Commercial Yeast Types and Concentrations

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Erynola Moniharapon
Helen Cynthia Dewi Tuhumury
Agustina Souripet

Abstract

Gandaria fruit wine, however, is still made using a straightforward fermentation procedure, hence the final product is murky. The correct variables for judging fruit wine quality still require a number of optimization procedures to be carried out. The purpose of this research was, therefore, to compare the primary fermentation and aging effects of different commercial yeast types on the physicochemical properties of gandaria fruit wine. Aging for 14 days caused a significant decrease in the characteristics of gandaria wine produced with different commercial yeast types and concentrations compared to the freshly fermented wine. Total sugar, total acidity, vitamin C, total soluble solids, and turbidity were among the characteristics that decreased. Whereas with aging, the alcohol content and pH values increased. The gandaria wine produced with commercial yeast Pakmaya at a 2.5% concentration was found to be the best due to the alcohol content that complied with the standard for fruit wine and had the clearest resulting wine both for the primary fermentation and the 14-day aging.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Erynola Moniharapon, Pattimura University

Department of Agricultural Product Technology

Helen Cynthia Dewi Tuhumury, Pattimura University

Department of Agricultural Product Technology

Agustina Souripet, Pattimura University

Department of Agricultural Product Technology

How to Cite
Moniharapon, E., Tuhumury, H. C. D. ., & Souripet, A. (2023). Characteristics of Gandaria (Bouea macrophylla Griff) Fruit Wine from Primary Fermentation and 14 Days Aging with Different Commercial Yeast Types and Concentrations. Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology, 7(4), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.55043/jaast.v7i4.171

References

  1. Alves, J. A., Lima, L. C. O., Nunes, C. A., Dias, D. R., & Schwan, R. F. (2011). Chemical, Physical–Chemical, and Sensory Characteristics of Lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn) Wines. Journal of Food Science, 76(5), S330–S336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02188.x
  2. AOAC. (2019). Official Methods Of Analysis Book (21st Editi). Association Of Official Anaylitical Chemist. Inc. https://www.aoac.org/resources/official-methods-of-analysis-revisions-to-21st-edition/
  3. Bowyer, P., Edwards, G., & Eyre, A. (2012). NTU vs wine filterability index - what does it mean for you? Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, 585, 76–80. http://bhftechnologies.com.au/ntu-vs-wine-filterability-index-what-does-it-mean-for-you/
  4. Cendrowski, A., Królak, M., & Kalisz, S. (2021). Polyphenols, l-ascorbic acid, and antioxidant activity in wines from rose fruits (Rosa rugosa). Molecules, 26(9), 2561. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092561
  5. Conde, C., Silva, P., Fontes, N., Dias, A. C. P., Tavares, R. M., Sousa, M. J., Agasse, A., Delrot, S., & Geros, H. (2007). Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine quality. Food Biophysics, 1(1), 1–22.https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/6820
  6. Isitua, C. C., & Ibeh, I. N. (2010). Novel Method of Wine Production from Banana (Musa acuminata) and Pineapple (Ananas comosus) wastes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(44), 7521–7524.https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/126788
  7. Joshi, V. K., Panesar, P. S., Rana, V. S., & Kaur, S. (2017). Science and Technology of Fruit Wines: An Overview. In. Kosseva M. R., Joshi V. K, & Panesar, P. S., (Eds). Science and Technology of Fruit Wine Production. (pp. 1–72). Academic Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800850-8.00001-6
  8. Joshi, V., Kumar, V., Debnath, M. K., Pattanashetti, S., Variath, M. T., & Khadabhavi, S.(2015). Assessing quality of blended wine prepared from white and red varieties of Grape (Vitis vinifera L.).International Journal of Agricultural and Food Science,5(1), 1–12.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275966281_Assessing_quality_of_blended_wine_prepared_from_white_and_red_varieties_of_Grape_Vitis_vinifera_L
  9. Matei, F., & Koseva, M. R. (2017). Microbiology of Fruit Wine Production. In. Kosseva, M. R., Joshi V. K, & Panesar, P. S., (Eds). Science and Technology of Fruit Wine Production. (pp.73-103). Academic Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800850-8.00002-8
  10. Onofri, L. (2022). A Note on the Economics of Fruit Wines: State of the Arts and Research Gaps. In Horticulturae,8(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020163
  11. Papilaya, P. M. (2016). Asosiasi Spasial Pohon Gandaria (Bouea macrophylla) Dengan Jenis-Jenis Pohon Dominan Di Hutan Kota Ambon Sebagai Informasi Dasar Pengolahan Kawasan. Prosiding Konser Karya Ilmiah Nasional, 135–162. https://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/8841
  12. Pino, J. A., & Queris, O. (2011). Analysis of volatile compounds of mango wine. Food Chemistry, 125(4), 1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.056
  13. Reboredo-Rodríguez, P., González-Barreiro, C., Rial-Otero, R., Cancho-Grande, B., & Simal-Gándara, J.(2015). Effects of Sugar Concentration Processes in Grapes and Wine Aging on Aroma Compounds of Sweet Wines—A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55(8), 1053-1073, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.680524
  14. Sumanik, R. A., Papilaya, P. M., & Rumahlatu, D. (2017). Pengaruh Konsentrasi Natrium Benzoat dan Lama Penyimpanan Terhadap Mutu Minuman Sari Buah Gandaria (Bouea macrophylla Griff) Berkarbonasi. BIOPENDIX: Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 4(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.30598/biopendixvol4issue1page22-28
  15. Swami, S. B., Thakor, N. J., & Divate, A. D. (2014). Fruit Wine Production: A Review. Journal of Food Research and Technology, 2(3), 93–100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270898894_Fruit_Wine_Production_A_Review
  16. Taihuttu, H. N. (2013a). Budidaya Tanaman Gandaria (Bouea macrophylla Griff) Di Desa Hative Besar Kecamatan Teluk Ambon Kota Ambon. Jurnal Budidaya Pertanian, 9(1), 43–46. https://ejournal.unpatti.ac.id/ppr_paperinfo_lnk.php?id=454
  17. Taihuttu, H. N. (2013b). Identifikasi Karakteristik Lahan Tanaman Gandaria (Bouea macrophylla Griff) Di Desa Hunuth Kecamatan Baguala Kota Ambon. Jurnal Agrologia, 2(1), 68–72. https://dx.doi.org/10.30598/a.v2i1.280
  18. Tao, Y., García, J. F., & Sun, D.-W. (2014). Advances in Wine Aging Technologies for Enhancing Wine Quality and Accelerating Wine Aging Process. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54(6), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.609949
  19. Thungbeni, K., Samir, T. E., & Deena, W. (2020). Effect of Different Levels of Wine Yeast and Sugar in Wine Production from Pineapple (Ananas comosus). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(12), 681–693. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.082
  20. Ugliano, M. (2013). Oxygen Contribution to Wine Aroma Evolution during Bottle Aging. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(26), 6125–6136. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400810v
  21. Velic, D., Velic, N., Klaric, D. A., Klaric, I., Tominac, V. P., Kosmerl, T., & Vidrih, R. (2018). The Production of Fruit Wines- A Review. Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology, 10(2), 279–290. http://www.ptfos.unios.hr/novicjfst/index.php/2018/10/30/cjfst-2018-10-2-19/
  22. Velić, D., Amidžić Klarić, D., Velić, N., Klarić, I., Petravić Tominac, V., & Mornar, A.(2018). Chemical Constituents of Fruit Wines as Descriptors of their Nutritional, Sensorial and Health-Related Properties. In.Diaz, A. V. & Garcia-Gimeno, R. M., (Eds.). Descriptive Food Science (p. Ch. 4). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78796