The Effect of Calcination Temperature on The Quality of Quicklime from Different Limestone Mines in West Sumatera, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 28, 2022
https://doi.org/10.55043/jaast.v6i1.44
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Reni Desmiarti
Bung Hatta University
Ellyta Sari
Bung Hatta University
Firdaus Firdaus
Bung Hatta University
Erda Desfitri
Bung Hatta University
Amelia Amir
Bung Hatta University
Inva Salsabil
Bung Hatta University
Maulana Rosadi
Gifu University
Nofri Naldi
Andalas University

Abstract

Quicklime is a widely used industrial chemical and its characteristics may be affected by the limestone characteristics and calcination temperature. The present study investigated the quicklime characteristics obtained from limestone after calcination at different temperatures (800, 900, and 1000 ℃) from six geological-different mines in West Sumatera, Indonesia. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was performed to characterize the elemental compositions in limestone and quicklime. The stoichiometric evaluation was examined to compare the obtained carbon dioxide (CO2) from experimental and theoretical results during calcination. Based on elemental composition from XRF analysis, all the investigated limestones are very pure limestones, with impurities of less than 1%. The level of calcium oxide (CaO) after calcination at 1000℃ increased to more than 90% for all investigated limestone. The obtained CaO and CO2 mass after calcination at 1000℃ for 5 h were more than 70 and 60 grams, respectively. However, the experimental results on CaO and CO2 mass were 5–12% less than theoretical mass, reflecting the partial decomposition of calcium carbonate during the calcination process.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Reni Desmiarti, Bung Hatta University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Ellyta Sari, Bung Hatta University

Department of Chemical Engineering,

Firdaus Firdaus, Bung Hatta University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Erda Desfitri, Bung Hatta University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Amelia Amir, Bung Hatta University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Inva Salsabil, Bung Hatta University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Maulana Rosadi, Gifu University

Graduate School of Engineering

Nofri Naldi, Andalas University

Graduate School of Chemistry

How to Cite
1.
Desmiarti R, Sari E, Firdaus F, Desfitri E, Amir A, Salsabil I, Rosadi M, Naldi N. The Effect of Calcination Temperature on The Quality of Quicklime from Different Limestone Mines in West Sumatera, Indonesia. J. appl. agricultural sci. technol. [Internet]. 2022Feb.28 [cited 2024Dec.8];6(1):41-8. Available from: https://www.jaast.org/index.php/jaast/article/view/44

References

  1. Cabera-Luna, K., Maldonado-Bandala, E. E., Nieves-Mendoza, D., Castro-Borges, P., Perez-Cortes, P., & Escalante-García, J. I. (2021). Supersulfated cements based on pumice with quicklime, anhydrate, and hemihydrate: Characterization and environmental impact. Cement and Concrete Composites, 90, 102787. https://doi.org/10.1016./j.ijggc.2019.102787.
  2. Carran, D., Hughes, J., Leslie, A., Kennedy, C. (2012). The effect of calcination time upon the slaking properties of quicklime. In: Válek, J., Hughes, J., Groot, C. (eds) Historic Mortars. RILEM Bookseries, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_22.
  3. Energy and Mineral Resources of West Sumatara (2021, December 17), Sumber daya bahan galian non logam. Retrieved from https://sumbarprov.go.id.
  4. Fedunik-Hofman, L., Bayon, A., & Donne, S. W. (2019). Comparative kinetic analysis of CaCO3/CaO reaction system for energy storage and carbon capture. Applied Sciences, 9, 4601. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214601.
  5. Fuchs, J., Müler, S., Schmid, J. C., & Hofbauer, H. (2019). A kinetic model of carbonation and calcination of limestone for sorption enhanced reforming of biomass. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 90, 102787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102787.
  6. Giammaria, G., & Lefferts, L. (2019). Catalytic effect of water on calcium carbonate decomposition. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 33, 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j.cou.2019.06.017.
  7. Guo, S., Wang, H., Liu, D., Yang, L., Wei, X., & Wu, S. (2015). Understanding the impacts of impurities and water vapor in limestone calcination in a laboratory-scale fluidized bed. Energy Fuels, 29(11), 7572–7583. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01218
  8. Houngaloune, S., Ariffin, K. S., Hussin, H. B., Watanabe, K., & Nhinxay, V. (2010). The effects of limestone characteristics, granulation and calcination temperature to the reactivity of quicklime. Malaysian Journal of Microscopy, 6(1), 53–57.
  9. Hwidi, R. S., Izhar, T. N. T., Saad, F. N. M., Dahham, O. S., Noriman, N. Z., & Shayfull, Z. (2018). Characterization of quicklime as raw material to hydrate lime: Effect of temperature on its characteristics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2030, 020027. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066668
  10. Jiang, B., Xia, D., Yu, B., Xiong, R., Ao, W., Zhang, P., & Chong, L. (2019). An environment-friendly process for limestone calcination with CO2 looping and recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118147.
  11. Kudlacz, K., & Rodríguez-Navarro, C. (2014). The mechanism of vapor phase hydration of calcium oxide: Implications for CO2 capture. Environmental Science and Technology, 21, 12411–12418. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5034662.
  12. Lewicka, E., Szulgaj, J., Burkowicz, A., & Galos K. (2020). Sources and markets of limestone flour in Poland. Resources, 9, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9100118.
  13. Maina, P. (2013). Improvement of lime reactivity towards desulfurization by hydration agents. Chemical Science Transactions, 2(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.7598/cst2013.233.
  14. Nordin, N., Hamzah, Z., Hashim, O., Kasim, F. H., & Abdullah, R. (2015). Effect of temperature in calcination process of seashells. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, 19(1), 65–70.
  15. Ontiveros-Ortega, E., Ruiz-Agudo, E. M., & Ontiveros-Ortega, A. (2018). Thermal decomposition of the CaO in traditional lime kilns. Applications in culture heritage conservation. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.059.
  16. Panjaitan, T.W.S., Dargusch, P., Wadley, D., & Aziz, A. A. (2021). Meeting international standards of cleaner production in developing countries: Challenges and financial realities facing the Indonesian cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clepro.2021.128604.
  17. Romero, M., Padilla, I., Contreras, M., & López-Delgado, A. (2021). Mullite-based ceramics from mining waste: A review. Minerals, 11, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11030332.
  18. Sandström, K., Broström, M., & Eriksson, M. (2021). Coal ash and limestone interactions in quicklime production. Fuel, 300, 120989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120989.
  19. Vola, G., Bresciani, P., Rodeghero, E., Sarandrea, L., & Cruciani, G. (2018). Impact of rock fabric, thermal behavior, and carbonate decomposition kinetics on quicklime industrial production and slaking reactivity. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 136, 967–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7769-7.
  20. Yadav, V. K., Yadav, K. K., Cabral-Pinto, M. M. S., Choudhary, N., Gnanamoorthy, G., Tirth, V., Prasad, S., Khan, A. H., Islam, S., & Khan, N. A. (2021). Applied Science, 11(9), 4212. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094212.
  21. Zhou, C., Yrjas, P., & Engvall, K. (2021). Reaction mechanisms for H2O-enhanced dolomite calcination at high pressure. Fuel Processing Technology, 217, 106830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106830.